Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    mschilling is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    49

    Default

    I find that the stacking or layering order makes a difference too. By moving what you want to snap to, below what you are moving, sometimes makes a difference, along with zooming in. I also have tried to relax about many aspects of assembly, and eyeball things where I can.

  2. #12
    rwillustrator is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Admittedly, it's a bit unclear as to what is happening, but maybe this will shed some light.

    Illustrator does have a setting called "snap to point" -- but it doesn't tell you WHAT snaps to the point, does it? Prior to CS4, Illustrator always snapped your CURSOR to the point -- not the point you dragged. So if you grab an anchor near its edge, you snap the edge of the anchor to another point. I know, this is totally silly, right? It only SEEMS like zooming in help because when you're zoomed in real close, it's much easier to grab an anchor from its center.

    In CS4, Smart Guides can now snap OBJECTS to other points. Meaning you can grab a rectangle from its right side and have the left side snap to a guide or another point. This matches the behavior of InDesign by the way.

    Mordy

  3. #13
    mschilling is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    49

    Default

    Thanks for that explanation.
    I did notice the difference with snapping and CS4 today.
    At first I thought it wasn't working at all, being used to CS3, but then it did what you said, especially after I turned up the snap distance to 8 (max).

  4. #14
    mandruch is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1

    Default

    This problem was really bothering me so I started messing around.
    Grab a path (not a point), hold down the command key, and simply drag/snap to another path.

  5. #15
    Rectangler is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1

    Thumbs up

    Yes!!!! A buried pixel snapping option in a vector program is exactly what I've always needed. Not only do vertical and horizontal lines consistently fly around at a rate of 0.5px -- but you are also unable to force it to the correct position by manually typing in the transform box. This handy feature is also a good way to get a new keyboard after smashing the old one with frustration.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  6. #16
    Lukas Engqvist's Avatar
    Lukas Engqvist is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,527

    Default

    Yes it's great for some, and I know others that have been so frustrated by spacing not being consistent as a result of pixel grid snapping. Important to know of it's existence!

  7. #17
    SWC1144 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Just my 2 cents, but I always work with Smart Guides on (cmd-U), and if I'm having trouble snapping two objects (points, paths, etc) together, I hold down the cmd key and it seems to force it to find a point to snap to. (And yes, I'm on a Mac.)


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Sponsors