Looking for Metal CTP

[JaimeZ]

We hope to get into CTP next year. I've looked at several 2up metal devices over the years, including the Presstek Vector TX52, RipIt (now Xante) SpeedSetter VM, and ECRM MAKO 4x.

But I seem to be leaning on Heidelberg's Suprasetter A52/A75.

After experiencing an imagesetter (a ECRM mako) without trapping and imposition software, I definitely want to get both with platesetter.

A reason for going with Heidelberg is we have a 5 color GTO and plan to replace the two duplicators with a Printmaster QM 46. It just seems that having their presses, with their platesetter and software I will have less issues.

What do you think? Or am I just being a Heidelberg snob?

PS. I have looked into the poly models, but I already have a Xante Platemaker 5 that addresses the lower end platemaking.

[Vee]

Join the club, I've been a Heidelberg snob for years.... the only ones who hate it don't have the luxury of using the stuff.

To answer your question, the shop I used to work for I ran a 4up Prosetter and we have several 2up & 4up Heidelberg presses. We had zero issues with the prepress software / hardware / presses or any combination of... I highly recommend the Suprasetter. A friend of mine sells them, and he is the most honest guy I've ever met - he hasn't had any customers have any issues to the best of my knowledge.

Best of luck to you.

[jluttrell]

I saw your posting and wanted to respond to provide you some additional information.

Having Heidelberg presses should not necessarily dictate the CTP device you decide to purchase. ECRM has customers all over the world who are imaging plates that are hung on Heidelberg presses. There are some pretty compelling arguments in favor of violet laser CTP, not the least of these being the total cost of ownership. Being familiar with the quality of the MAKO imagesetter, it would not surprise you to know that ECRM has an unprecedented parts replacement warranty on MAKO CTP. Five years on the laser and three years on all parts. It is “no-strings-attached” warranty as you are not obligated to a service contract or plate deal, it comes standard with our devices. Check out: www.totalcost.ecrm.com

You highlight a key issue for many shops and that is the matter of workflow. Since the time you purchased your MAKO imagesetter, ECRM has developed a workflow solution called WorkMates. It was designed from the ground up to address the needs of printers who do not have multiple sites but want to implement a PDF based workflow in their shop. It has all the imposition bells and whistles as well as everything you will need for trapping. You can check that out at: ECRM Imaging Systems - Commercial Printing

I hope this information will assist you as you evaluate your options.
Kind regards
Jim Luttrell
ECRM Imaging Systems

[JaimeZ]

Jim Luttrell,

Thank you for the information. I will agree, with the exception of the Heidelberg, ECRM makes a great device for the 2up market compared to the other platesetters I've looked at. Jim Hamlin from ECRM has visited me several times and I will take a serious look at your product. It does help that I've had a good experience with the Mako imagesetter. But alas, we will not be making the decision until sales are up dramatically or we finish paying off the lease on our GTO--which ever comes first.

[Pressman's Pride]

I have a 2Up Ripit VM2 in my warehouse from a Bank auction. Exxtra Corp made a fabulous Imagestter in the VM2. Plug and Play main board with very few flaws in the marking engine and a powerful L3 PDF workflow complete with all the bells and whistles, trapping, imposition, remote control and so on. I could easily give you an online demo anytime you like. The Rip is set up and running daily for demo purposes. I have many years experience with equipment. Best part, price is very good for this much muscle. You have researched so you know the fit of the VM2 but unless you've seen the Rip in action I would advise to at least try it out.

Erick
Pressmanspride.com

[Internal_R&D_Analyst]

Another 2-up not yet mentioned is Printware PlateStream Violet, 30 plates per hour max.

[cosmo]

we have a ECRM mako4matic, it is a great machine, we run around 150-200 plates a day out of it with no problems, dont get a platesetter without auto loading and processing, you will waste far to much time loading it up.

[cosmo]

Jim, when you say 5 years on the laser, at what exposure setting is that? we had a laser go in 2 years.

I saw your posting and wanted to respond to provide you some additional information.

Having Heidelberg presses should not necessarily dictate the CTP device you decide to purchase. ECRM has customers all over the world who are imaging plates that are hung on Heidelberg presses. There are some pretty compelling arguments in favor of violet laser CTP, not the least of these being the total cost of ownership. Being familiar with the quality of the MAKO imagesetter, it would not surprise you to know that ECRM has an unprecedented parts replacement warranty on MAKO CTP. Five years on the laser and three years on all parts. It is “no-strings-attached” warranty as you are not obligated to a service contract or plate deal, it comes standard with our devices. Check out: www.totalcost.ecrm.com

You highlight a key issue for many shops and that is the matter of workflow. Since the time you purchased your MAKO imagesetter, ECRM has developed a workflow solution called WorkMates. It was designed from the ground up to address the needs of printers who do not have multiple sites but want to implement a PDF based workflow in their shop. It has all the imposition bells and whistles as well as everything you will need for trapping. You can check that out at: ECRM Imaging Systems - Commercial Printing

I hope this information will assist you as you evaluate your options.
Kind regards
Jim Luttrell
ECRM Imaging Systems

[JaimeZ]

dont get a platesetter without auto loading and processing, you will waste far to much time loading it up.

We use about 100 to 150 metal plates a month or about 5 to 8 a day. Do you still think auto loading is needed for this volume? The platesetter we choice will be able to be retrofitted for auto loading in the future should metal plate usage dramatically increase.

[hagar]

We use about 100 to 150 metal plates a month or about 5 to 8 a day. Do you still think auto loading is needed for this volume? The platesetter we choice will be able to be retrofitted for auto loading in the future should metal plate usage dramatically increase.

Disagree my self, I work installing some other systems which include manual systems, 5 to 8 plates will take very little time to load, especially if its for a smaller plate size. only thing you may need to work out, is if it viable on only 5 to 8 plates a day.