Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1
    him up north is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    12

    Default Harlequin vs. Illustrator?

    We run two Esko Flowdrive workflows (v5.2) with Harlequin rips under the hood (don't know the version but I'm guessing quite old). We use pre-separated pdfs in our impositions, imposed using Preps.

    As a company, we have begun moving over to Illustrator CS4 from Freehand. We are finding however that jobs are taking huge amounts of time to rip. Literally hours and hours. This is a situation we never encountered when using Freehand. Is Illustrator vector art (when converted to postscript and then PDF) more complex than Freehand? We're left wondering if the Adobe upgrade path has overtaken the capabilities of the Harlequin.

    Has anyone else encountered such an issue?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Why postscript to pdf. Why not save as a pdf from Illy?

  3. #3
    him up north is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Just a legacy of what we've always done. Workflow started out donkeys' years ago as pre-separated postscript workflow.

  4. #4
    zombie is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    79

    Default

    You need to upgrade your rip.

  5. #5
    him up north is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zombie View Post
    You need to upgrade your rip.
    To what? And why?

  6. #6
    zombie is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    79

    Default

    To a newer rip version. Your rip is HQ 5.2, it does not handle properly CS4 files, and it's slow, indeed.
    Latest version of HQ I saw from Esko is 7.0, but probably they have 8.x too.

  7. #7
    him up north is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Thanks, Zombie.

  8. #8
    Gramshi is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zombie View Post
    ... Latest version of HQ I saw from Esko is 7.0, but probably they have 8.x too.
    Wrong. Esko 7 is not HQ based.(It's Flexrip and it's CPSI or Adobe PDF Print Engine based)
    Latest FlowDrive version is 5.x. No any software upgrade available for FlowDrive.

    Try lower PDF versions for speed ripping in FlowDrive.

    Edit: HQ and FlowDrive verisons are different. FlowDrive 5.2 is not mean HQ 5.2
    Last edited by Gramshi; 12-17-2009 at 10:57 AM.

  9. #9
    maxon is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    227

    Default

    Esko's Flowdrive is built around Harlequin. As zombie said an upgrade is a must, version 8.1 has an almost same look and feel but is light years ahead from ver.5.
    I have no difficulties processing any sort of PDF files thrown at my harlequin (other than Esko) even with transparencies, at least once they pass preflight. Latest quark, cs4, you name it.

  10. #10
    Gramshi is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    50

    Default

    @maxon and @zombie
    Please give us a web link for FlowDrive version 7 or 8.
    Last edited by Gramshi; 12-17-2009 at 11:26 AM.


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Sponsors